Article - August 4, 2008 - NetworkWorld

One big, healthy mobile network

It took time to get it just right, but healthcare staff and patients are reaping the benefits of the network installed by wireless veterans at Rush University Medical Center

By Paul Desmond

Electronic medical-records systems are all the rage in hospitals around the country, promising to improve accuracy and efficiency. EMR fairly screams for a wireless network to support it, however, given that healthcare professionals need access to medical records from pretty much everywhere. Karl Oder, senior director at Rush University Medical Center in Chicago, knows well what it takes to deploy a wireless network that can support not only EMR but RFID and VoIP as well. He and his team, which includes Alden Brugada, manager of telecommunications and networking, tried various iterations of wireless before hitting on their current winning formula.

When did you first get into wireless?
Karl Oder: We had wireless around 1995. It was a very early system that didn't work very well, and we eventually pulled it out. Another wireless deployment went in around 2000 or so. That was again a proprietary system. It worked better. It was upgraded in 2003 to a nonproprietary Cisco system, and that has since been upgraded to what we have now.

What does the network look like now?
We have roughly 700 LWAPs Lightweight Access Points, all Cisco Aironet, models 1231 to 1242. Most of our controllers are WiSMs Wireless Services Modules that sit in the Cisco Catalyst 6500 Series chassis. We have six chassis with two WiSMs per chassis, for redundancy. Each WiSM has two controllers, and each controller can handle 150 access points. So, the capacity is about 300 access points per WiSM, but we don't go over about 250. We have a Cisco Wireless Control System, which basically monitors the entire environment. The network extends to roughly 10 buildings in a campus environment, plus one hospital in Oak Park, about 15 miles away. It has its own wireless controller and is connected across T-1s to our main campus.

How has the network evolved since 2003?
The big difference between 2003 and what we have now was the move to LWAPs from the individual access points being managed one-by-one. We also needed more capacity and more coverage. The biggest impetus for that was an expanded EMR initiative. Initially we provided only computerized provider-order entry, where the physicians mainly worked on computers in the halls. So, our 2003 deployment only covered the hallways. When you go to a full EMR, with nurses entering vital signs and such, you need to get the computer inside the patient room. We were also looking forward to deploying VoIP throughout, as well as RFID.

Full story


Page Information

  • 5 months ago [history]
  • View page source
  • You're not logged in
  • No tags yet learn more

Wiki Information
Update to PBwiki 2.0

An entirely new PBwiki experience, including folders and easier editing.

Convert Now for Free | Learn more